Notify me of new posts via email. Skip to content April 4, April 4, nytbensvtiv Share this: Twitter Facebook. Like this: Like Loading Published by nytbensvtiv Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Jasmine Wolfe. Numerologist, astrologer, and tarot reader. Tags: Spiritual Health. Loading More Posts Featured Collection.
Even the oldest legends telling us about the Egyptian chronology dating back to 49, BC, or the Mayan calendar starting in 18, BC, or the Mahabharata Hindu calendar in BC, or the more recent Byzantine or Scandinavian beginnings of time counting in the years BC or BC, now seem very believable and most likely true. One of the recent discoveries allowing us a glimpse of early man was made in the cliffs of Del Mar near San Diego, California.
The skull of a Homo sapiens or Cro-Magnon man was found and dated by Dr. Bada, professor of marine biology at the Scripps Institute 35 of Oceanography, as more than 50, years, and maybe even 65, years old. Both scientists agreed that the brain in this skull had been large enough for the highest intelligence and that this individual could have been capable during his lifetime of observing and registering astronomical cycles.
Possibly he could even have made mathematical calculations as complex as the constant of Nineveh. But unfortunately we will never know if this man was born on Earth or came here as a visitor from another space civilization.
Our only certitude is that there were very intelligent men on Earth more than 50, years ago, a fact that topples all our present scientific theories about the evolution of man. The discovery that our ancestors of 65, years ago knew as much and probably more than we do about the solar system is really baffling.
First of all, the birth date of the Nineveh constant coincides precisely with the sudden arrival on Earth of Cro-Magnon man, the first human with a brain volume equal to ours, the first successful result in a program for the improvement of the human race. The primitive man before him had no more than cubic centimetres of brain. The modern man in today's civilized countries averages about 1, cubic centimetres.
But if people living on Earth 65, years ago were the primitive Stone Age humans, who, as the anthropologists think, could hardly fashion a flint stone, they could not possibly have calculated the Nineveh constant based on the precession of the equinoxes - a slow westward drift of one degree in seventy-two years, and the revolution periods of the planets, three of which, Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto, are totally invisible to the naked eye.
The only logical conclusion, no matter how much it will make establishment scientists frown, is to assume that astronauts from another solar or galactic civilization visited our ancestors 65, years ago and started the sudden evolution of man by improving his intelligence through insemination and mutation and then by initiation into the knowledge of astronomy, mathematics, metallurgy, and other secrets of civilization. All this could have happened during the interglacial period between the first and second Wurm ice ages, when the polar star was Vega and the climate on Earth was just about the same as it is right now, if we want to believe the 21,year climatic 36 cycle that has been discovered in the geological carboniferous strata.
It was an ideal time to create and educate a new and superior human race. But how can we prove this? About sixty years ago, in , European radio operators in France, Germany, Norway, and Holland noticed a strange phenomenon. When they transmitted in all directions a series of signals, they received two series of echoes instead of one.
Normal echoes, after circling the Earth by bouncing several times on the ionosphere, always came back after a normal delay of one seventh of one second. On the contrary, abnormal echoes always came back after an interval varying from 3 to 15 seconds, as if they had bounced from some object located at a distance from Earth of , to 2,, km, but always a little bit farther than the Moon.
As usual, this discovery was kept as secret as possible, and, after several years, it was even completely forgotten. Then a few years ago, a young Scottish astronomer by the name of Duncan Lunan had a bright idea. He thought that these signals could very well have come from an alien spaceship orbiting the Earth at about the same distance as the Moon and that the variable intervals between the transmission of signals and reception of echoes might represent an intelligent coded message representing geometric figures or even the map of a constellation, as Bracewell had already suggested in With the usual television technique of so many dots per line and so many lines per frame, Lunan transferred the various intervals on a chart as he would have done on a television screen.
He then successively obtained several different drawings of the same constellation, with different orientations, but with the same star always at the centre. As Lunan says in his book Man and the Stars, as an astronomer it did not take him long to recognize the constellation as that of Bootes and the star as Epsilon Bootis, which our ancestors called lzar and which is located at about light-years, or million million km, from the Earth.
One of Lunan's important discoveries was that the configuration of the Bootes constellation shown on his charts was not exactly the 37 same as that which we can see today from the Earth, and he found an explanation. The big star Alpha Bootis, or Arcturus, is one of the fastest moving stars in our skies. It has an angular motion of 2. According to Lunen, Arcturus now appears to us about seven degrees apart from where it appears on the chart, which means that the map could have been established and transmitted 11, years ago.
However, Arcturus does not move with a constant apparent velocity, and taking an average of only 2 seconds of arc per year, we obtain a date of 12, years ago which corresponds to those of the other stars of the same constellation. As a consequence, assuming there is an alien spacecraft presently orbiting the Earth, it arrived in its present position about 13, years ago; and, after observing the configuration of their native constellation of Bootes as they saw it from their orbit around the Earth at that time, the astronauts on board have been continuously transmitting signals since then, waiting for human astronomers to become intelligent enough to understand them.
Finally, around , the first radio signals were transmitted from the Earth by Marconi, Tesla, and others, and the Izarian astronauts knew they were now in business. They started retransmitting the earth signals, with various intervals representing a code, and the code represented a map of the constellation of Bootes with the star lzar at the centre. For me, however, the most extraordinary and the most controversial part of the story is not so much the constellation map as the intervals between the different signals from the alien spacecraft.
These intervals are always an exact number of seconds of time and, as you know, our second of time is supposed to be a human invention. Up to now, the Sumerians have been credited with the fantastic idea of dividing the solar day into 86, equal parts they called seconds.
In other words, these alien astronauts from a distant planet in outer space, who had been orbiting our planet in a spacecraft for 13, years, knew from the very beginning that the human race divided the solar day into 86, seconds of time.
And how could they know it 38 unless they made the division themselves and landed on the Earth to teach the humans how to use the second to measure the passing of time? And then everything becomes clear. Seven and nine have always been sacred numbers. Their product multiplied by , gives us 6.
Multiplied then by the days of the year and by the 86, seconds of the day, we obtain the mysterious Nineveh number of ,,,, seconds of time.
And since we know that the Nineveh constant corresponds to the exact length of the sidereal and tropical years as they were 64, years ago, this seems to indicate that the landing on Earth of the alien astronauts from lzar did actually occur about that time or maybe a little bit later.
What happened next, we can only guess. It is quite possible that, after inseminating and educating the human race, they went back to their home planet to report on the results of their mission and returned to our solar system only 13, years ago when they thought the human race had become civilized enough. As a strange coincidence, this was the time of the advanced civilization of Atlantis, 1, years before its destruction by a cosmic cataclysm; and it could very well be that survivors from Atlantis or their descendants are still in orbit around the Earth, visiting us from time to time.
There is, however, something else in the discovery of Duncan Lunen that seems to have escaped his brilliant mind. As I said before, the ancient human year of days does not make any sense on the Earth where it does not correspond to any astronomical phenomenon. But it could mean something for alien astronauts orbiting the Earth.
We shall see later that a solar year of days would correspond to a distance from the Sun 1. Assuming for the Earth an average distance of In that case, its minimum distance from the Earth could be as low as , kilometres, which is about the distance of the Moon and corresponds to the minimum delay of the echoes.
There seem to be a number of other conclusions that could be derived from the discovery of Duncan Lunen; but I have no room left here to discuss them and they will be the subject of another book. Let us just say for the time being that the discovery of the Izarian spaceship seems to explain the origin of the constant of Nineveh. One may ask why the constant of the solar system should have been calculated 64, years ago, and the answer may be that it was the time of a special configuration of the planets in our solar system.
If my calculations are right, there was at the time a five-fold conjunction of five of the outer planets - Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune - an exact alignment of these planets with the sun which is so rare it takes place only once every 4, years. Personally, I like this number '64,' because it is exactly six times the number 10, that was the sacred number of the Chaldean and Hindu astrologers; so the number 64, must have been the sacred number of cultures long before the Hindus and the Chaldeans.
The number and its different multiples like 10,, 86,, and , are found in many sacred texts and legends of the distant past. Why did the Mayas, the Sumerians, the Chaldeans, the Babylonians, and the Egyptians use in their calculations enormous periods of time that were all multiples of days or years? Their choice must have had some reason and I can see only two possible explanations.
Either the number was given to their ancestors by astronauts or at that time the solar year was exactly days long. The first explanation is very possible, the second one less so - but not totally impossible.
The laws discovered by Johannes Kepler say that for the solar year to be exactly days, the distance of our planet Earth from the Sun would have to be 1. That seems to be impossible at first glance, but less so if one remembers the 40 theories of the planet Venus being a planet that wandered into our system at some time in the past and was captured by our Sun.
Earth certainly had its part in this capture and was possibly pushed farther out from its original orbit, giving us a longer year. So it is possible that our year was exactly days long ago and that the constant of Nineveh represented at that time exactly 6. As we will see later, there is another possibility, namely, that of a longer day of That could also explain why the constant of Nineveh was calculated in stable seconds instead of days which could vary slowly over the ages.
When after a while one gets used to the idea that all that takes place in the solar system is regulated by one constant, the mind is ready to start understanding one of the great mysteries of human history, namely, the regular returns of ice ages, that have played a very important part in the existence of the primitive man and in the development of our present civilization.
We are nearly certain now that the periodic invasions of ice from the polar caps are caused by several overlapping astronomical cycles. Some of these cycles are well known while others are objects of heated debates and therefore of particular interest to me.
The first of these cycles is the precession of equinoxes, or the rotation of the axis of our planet around the pole of the ecliptic. The duration of this cycle is about 26, years. The second cycle is that of the variation of the eccentricity of Earth's orbit around the Sun. Its duration is about , years. The third cycle is the combination of the first two and causes changes of temperature and humidity on our planet. This third cycle is about 21, years. The fourth cycle is that of the variable obliquity of our Earth's rotational axis in relation to the ecliptic and its duration is about 42, years.
The fifth cycle, a combination of all previous cyclic changes and possibly one or two more unknown factors, is that of the ice ages. This is the cycle that no two scientists explain in the same way. Each geologist has his own theory and refuses all the others. I am not a geologist and therefore can say what I think.
Let me just state that the glacial periods repeat themselves every , years 41 or so, with a shorter warm period of about 42, years in between the two severest periods of ice, and then a longer and warmer period of about 84, years with a slightly colder period in the middle.
It would take five such periods or about , years for the whole chain of events to be repeated. The theory is in harmony with the constant of Nineveh. You have possibly noticed already that all the above cycles are approximate multiples of a common factor - a time span of 5, years that I call the 'building block' of ice ages.
When we divide the constant of 2, million days by 1,, we obtain a construction block of 1,, days or 5, This is very close to 5, years and also noticeably close to the Great Cycle of the Mayas that was equal to 5, years.
So our ice age block is close enough to simplify it to 5, years; and if we use it, we obtain results that, except for the Mulberg and Wurm glaciations, are very close to the dates given by certain geologists that 1 do not want to name here.
Of these two, the Mulberg glaciation shows only one glacial period, while the Wurm has three. That seems difficult to explain unless the great glaciation cycle of , years is accepted with alternate very warm and very cold periods every , years. That would have precluded the first ice age of the Mulberg from occurring , years ago and would have caused the third ice age of the Wurm that ended only 20, years ago and caused the Great Deluge by sudden melting of the ice sheet.
We can calculate then, under these conditions, that the peak ice ages occurred in the following approximate numbers of years ago: Gunz - , and ,; Mindel - , and ,; Mulberg - ,; Riss - , and ,; Wurm ,, 61,, and 20, If this chronology is correct and nothing changes in our solar system, we do not have to worry much at present about the two next ice ages.
These should come 21, and 62, years from now, allowing us plenty of time to prepare and to emigrate to tropical zones, if it becomes necessary. The constant of Nineveh has many more surprises to offer and I cannot cease to marvel about it. One example is the case of the planet Pluto.
Its orbit has an inclination of 17 degrees from the ecliptic where the orbits of other planets are. It was discovered in January by the astronomer Clyde Tombaugh only because it crossed the ecliptic 42 at that time - an event that will occur again only in the year when this planet will return to the southern hemisphere.
We might add that Pluto is visible only with the most powerful telescopes and its planetary movements can be detected only by successive photographs, all proof that our ancestors could not have known about the existence of this planet. Yet it seems that they did know. The sidereal year of Pluto has been estimated by American astronomers to be 90, solar days. But sometimes, as in the case of the comet Kohoutek, in , astronomers too make some mistakes. Since its discovery, Pluto has made only about one fifth of its voyage around the Sun, so a slight mistake in observations is possible.
A negligible error in the calculated long year of Pluto would be perfectly excusable. So let's suppose that the true year of Pluto is, in reality, 90, solar days. Now the constant of Nineveh represents exactly 25, revolutions of Pluto and this can be no more of a coincidence than the fact that it also represents exactly cycles of precession of the equinoxes.
Without a doubt, our ancestors knew about the existence of Pluto and used its sidereal year together with the Great Year as the base of the great constant of the solar system, the constant of Nineveh. We will have to wait until , when Pluto will conclude its first revolution around the Sun since this planet was discovered, to know the precise length of its sidereal year. If it is 90, days and not 90, as preliminary observations indicate, we will have more proof concerning the Nineveh constant.
Strangely enough, the number 90, days can be found in the Sumerian mathematical series of the constant. What we still do not know is who the astronauts were who brought knowledge about Pluto to our ancestors.
But whoever they were, these astronauts also instructed our forefathers about the existence of Proserpine, a planet much larger than our Earth at a distance of almost ten billion kilometres from the Sun, with a revolution period of terrestrial years. Nobody on Earth can say for sure that he has seen Proserpine and I doubt very much that it ever will be visible from a terrestrial vantage point.
Yet our ancestors had knowledge of its existence. Some people might be surprised about my assurance that our ancestors knew the planets Uranus and Neptune as well as the precession of the equinoxes. A good example is the planet Uranus, which is usually not visible with the naked eye, but sometimes shows up for a few weeks with an apparent diameter larger than Mars at its greatest distance from Earth. Uranus was well known long before its official discovery by Sir William Herschel in , but it took some time to make sure that it was a planet and not a star.
The ancient astrologers also could have noticed the acceleration and slowing down of a known planet when it passed another unknown planet. At the last conjunction of Uranus and Saturn on 4 May, , the acceleration of Saturn was 2 minutes a day in February, 4 minutes in March, 6 in April, 8 in May, then 7 in June, 6 in July, 4 in August, and 2 in September when the conjunction of these two planets was over.
Adams in England. There is some talk at this time about the big conjunction of planets that will take place on 10 May 2, Seven planets will be lined up with the sun. Some people have expressed fear that that combined force of attraction could cause tidal waves and earthquakes on our planet.
Some even predict that California will break off along the San Andreas fault and drift away into the Pacific. For me, a resident of San Diego, such thought is not very reassuring; but neither does it upset me much, since I have decided to retire to Tahiti anyway. However, for sheer fun, I have made some calculations to see how much influence the combined gravitational forces of the various planets could exert on our Earth. As everyone knows, the gravitational force is directly proportionate to the product of the masses of the objects and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.
The comets that frequently return to our Sun do not prove the validity of the constant, but the revolution periods of the rare ones fit perfectly into the cycle of the constant. Whiston's comet, for example, makes 10, revolutions around the Sun in 2, million days, while Crigg's comet makes 37, revolutions during that same period of time.
As for Halley's comet, which passed its closest point to the Sun in February, , it makes exactly 81, revolutions in 2, days! I could not close this chapter without a word or two about the possible existence of some more planets out beyond Pluto. At this moment there are to the best of my knowledge at least three candidates. First there is the planet which Brady named Proserpine - the same name that our ancestors gave to this body.
According to him, the planet is sixty-four times farther away from the Sun than we are and needs years for one revolution around the Sun. The constant of Nineveh indicates a revolution period of , days. Next is the planet of William Pickering that, according to the constant, should have a year of , days corresponding to terrestrial years. Third and lastly, there is the planet of Schuette and, as the constant of Nineveh shows, it should have a sidereal revolution period of , days or about years.
It could very well be that all three of these planets are one and the same -- the famous Proserpine that has been seen by three different astronomers on three different occasions in three different positions, and at three different distances. All that, however, does not explain how our ancestors knew about the existence of Proserpine any more than it explains who told them that Mars has two satellites, Jupiter four, Saturn seven, and Uranus two.
And how did the Dogons, a primitive tribe of Mali, know that an enormous planet circles around the star Sirius, with a revolution period of fifty years? I certainly do not want to give the impression that I am entirely devoted to extraterrestrial civilizations and flying saucers; but in all honesty, one has to wonder how our distant ancestors of the Stone Age could possibly have had all of this knowledge of astronomy and mathematics?
They could not have found It all by themselves. Somebody had to have helped them, a god or an astronaut. Everyone had his own theory and defended it firmly.
But most of the time this dispute went on between the French and the German archaeologists and that is probably one of the reasons why I became interested.
The situation was complicated by the fact that there were two Mayan calendars - one that was quite well known and another that no one had yet deciphered. To measure short time spans, the Mayas used a cycle of years and this cycle was well known and accepted so that everybody could agree on it. The Mayas celebrated in a very original way, the meeting of 73 sacred years with 52 profane years. They extinguished all the fires in the household, smashed all the pots and pans in the kitchen, and sat up all night long in fear and trepidation that the end of the world might be there and that they might never see the Sun again.
When nevertheless the Sun rose again in the morning and the Mayas had to acknowledge that the world was still there, they relit their fires and sacrificed a few virgins and prisoners and went back happily to enjoy life for another 52 years.
Evidently, every years, when the planets Mercury and Venus were in conjunction with the Sun, and especially every years, when Mars joined the group, the celebration was even bigger and the number of virgins and prisoners sacrificed was substantially increased. To compute long periods of time and to make astronomical calculations, the Mayas used a calendar that was based on the Great Cycle - a period of time that was not precisely known to our scientists.
It was vaguely thought that the last cycle had started about 3, years before Christ. It was also thought that this cycle had to run out soon. Finally, it was assumed that this long span was divided in cycles a little shorter than twenty years each. For this very scant knowledge we have to thank the bishop of Yucatan, Diego de Landa, who in ordered all the ancient Mayan documents and manuscripts to 47 be publicly burned because he could not understand these treasures.
To him they were the work of Satan. Anyone who wants to tackle the mystery of the Mayan calendar today has to solve three different problems: the staffing date of this calendar, the length of the time span this calendar covered, and the duration of its short cycles.
Opinions on all three questions differ widely. Originally, the dates proposed for the start of this long calendar were as much as years apart. Recently this discrepancy has been reduced to years and there are only two groups of American archaeologists who dispute each other.
The team led by Edward Thompson thinks it began in BC. As the Mayas counted time, this year difference represents thirteen periods of 20 years each that are called 'katuns'.
Twenty katuns, or years, are equal to one 'baktun'. The duration of the Mayan long calendar was accepted by the archaeologists with good reason to be 5, years, or times 20 years, because the scientists were well aware of the fact that for the Mayas the numbers 13, 26, and were very important.
The short cycle, as everybody thought, had to be about When the radiocarbon dating method was introduced, the archaeologists were sure that in no time all the mysteries of the Mayan calendar would be solved. Carbon dating seemed tailor-made for this purpose because all Mayan temples had heavy wooden beams made from a tree called 'sapodilla', which has a rich latex content and does not rot.
Also insects do not affect this evergreen which is now cultivated to produce chicle, the main ingredient of chewing gum. Furthermore, all inscriptions on Mayan temples mark the exact date according to the Mayan calendar when they were built. The Mayas used the vigesimal counting by 20, with a dash and dot system.
The numbers were represented by an eye that had the value of zero, a dot that counted for 1, and a dash that counted for 5. As the carbon-dating system was thought to be at that time very reliable, all that supposedly had to be done to bring our calendar and the unknown Mayan calendar into accord was to take a sliver of 48 sapodilla wood from the beam of the temple, find out by its radioactive carbon content how old it was, and then compare its age with the inscribed Mayan date on the lintel of the temple.
In the middle of the tropical jungle of Guatemala stands the magnificent Mayan temple of Tikal built in a year indicated thus: one dash four dots three dashes two dashes one eye and one more eye - which in our numbers would mean 9 15 10 0 0 or the Mayan year nine baktuns, fifteen katuns, ten tuns, zero months, zero days, or about 3, of our years since the last start of the Mayan long calendar.
Carbon dating was to resolve the dispute and everybody went down to Tikal to obtain fresh samples of the old temple lintel for the laboratory where it was to be tested by the newest, most precise methods of radiocarbon dating. The first results obtained from burning the Tikal sapodilla slivers indicated that the Spinden group was right, but later tests with a greater number of samples proved finally that the Thompson group was the winner.
All were satisfied because each team had won one set of the match, but the mystery of the Mayan calendar was not solved. As we will see later on, the real winner was the Thompson team that came very close to the right answer - the year or two years less than that they had proposed. The most amusing aspect was that this astonishingly precise prediction was obtained from a wrong starting date and a wrong short cycle. A similar case in history is the precise calculation by Eratosthenes of Alexandria who 2, years ago established the circumference of our planet by using two wrong values whose errors cancelled each other and thus yielded the right answer.
I had long been intrigued by the mysteries of the Mayan calendar but never had the time to take a closer look. As a space scientist, In November I read a much later version, Our Cosmic Ancestors , published by a small press in Arizona ten years before. The chapter on the Nineveh
0コメント